<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Global Justice Project: Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gjpi.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gjpi.org</link>
	<description>Following the S.J. Quinney College of Law's Iraq Project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The many lives of Article 136(b) Criminal Procedure Code, Law 23 of 1971 by Global Justice Project: Iraq &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Criminal Procedure Code 23 of 1971</title>
		<link>http://gjpi.org/2009/05/23/the-many-lives-of-article-136b-criminal-procedure-code-23-of-1971/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Justice Project: Iraq &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Criminal Procedure Code 23 of 1971</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gjpi.org/?p=1783#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] in May 2009 that the Prime Minister had suspended the operation of the law in part. See more here] e) In paragraph 144 (a) delete the words&#8221; at a rate of no less than 10 dinars and no more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in May 2009 that the Prime Minister had suspended the operation of the law in part. See more here] e) In paragraph 144 (a) delete the words&#8221; at a rate of no less than 10 dinars and no more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iraqi Committee on Judicial Independence by Global Justice Project: Iraq &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Judicial Independence Conference</title>
		<link>http://gjpi.org/2009/03/23/iraqi-committee-on-judicial-independence/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Justice Project: Iraq &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Judicial Independence Conference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gjpi.org/?p=1251#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] attended the Judicial Independence Conference in Erbil on 30 and 31 March 2009, organised by ICJI, IIRL and USIP. The conference presentations addressed a number of aspects of judicial independence [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attended the Judicial Independence Conference in Erbil on 30 and 31 March 2009, organised by ICJI, IIRL and USIP. The conference presentations addressed a number of aspects of judicial independence [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Status of Coalition Provisional Authority Regulations, Orders, Memoranda and Notices by * JUNI’s Response to Linny’s Post… and further clarification &#124; Iraqi Dinar News</title>
		<link>http://gjpi.org/2009/08/23/status-of-coalition-provisional-authority-regulations-orders-memoranda-and-notices/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>* JUNI’s Response to Linny’s Post… and further clarification &#124; Iraqi Dinar News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 04:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gjpi.org/?p=1928#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] The really qwerky side to this is that the Coalition Provisional Authority was dissolved in 2004. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_Provisional_Authority So the question was thus:  How then do these CPA Orders still have legal effect, if the CPA was dissolved in 2004?  Well, a few weeks ago there was an article that came out stating that parliament had 300 or so laws before them to vote on (See:http://currencynewshound.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/iraq-parliament-to-reconvene-sunday/ ) .  Hidden in the midst of these laws was one “abolishing CPA Order 68″.  This intrigued me because it led to the only conclusion that made sense—and that is that all of the CPA Orders were given legal effect in Iraqi law, and therefore, to abolish a CPA Order required another law to repeal it. Well, I would like to thank my PD friend taxranger for finding the proof on this, and that is that all CPA Orders are “grandfathered” into Iraqi law.  See: http://www.gjpi.org/2009/08/23/status-of-coalition-provisional-authority-regulations-orders-memorand... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The really qwerky side to this is that the Coalition Provisional Authority was dissolved in 2004. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_Provisional_Authority So the question was thus:  How then do these CPA Orders still have legal effect, if the CPA was dissolved in 2004?  Well, a few weeks ago there was an article that came out stating that parliament had 300 or so laws before them to vote on (See:<a href="http://currencynewshound.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/iraq-parliament-to-reconvene-sunday/" rel="nofollow">http://currencynewshound.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/iraq-parliament-to-reconvene-sunday/</a> ) .  Hidden in the midst of these laws was one “abolishing CPA Order 68″.  This intrigued me because it led to the only conclusion that made sense—and that is that all of the CPA Orders were given legal effect in Iraqi law, and therefore, to abolish a CPA Order required another law to repeal it. Well, I would like to thank my PD friend taxranger for finding the proof on this, and that is that all CPA Orders are “grandfathered” into Iraqi law.  See: http://www.gjpi.org/2009/08/23/status-of-coalition-provisional-authority-regulations-orders-memorand&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Status of Coalition Provisional Authority Regulations, Orders, Memoranda and Notices by Will US Empire fall - Page 55 - Political Forum</title>
		<link>http://gjpi.org/2009/08/23/status-of-coalition-provisional-authority-regulations-orders-memoranda-and-notices/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Will US Empire fall - Page 55 - Political Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gjpi.org/?p=1928#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...]    ...?... that &#039;ideology&#039; is the laws you just quoted. You just proved yourself wrong. Read this; Status of Coalition Provisional Authority Regulations, Orders, Memoranda and Notices  Here&#039;s the part that concerns you;  The CPA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    &#8230;?&#8230; that &#8216;ideology&#8217; is the laws you just quoted. You just proved yourself wrong. Read this; Status of Coalition Provisional Authority Regulations, Orders, Memoranda and Notices  Here&#8217;s the part that concerns you;  The CPA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

